Saving Energy Through Food
Ch05 -This is the old United Nations University website. Visit the new site at B. Potty Central Food Technological Research Institute, Mysore, India ABSTRACT Awareness of the importance of energy saving in manufacturing processes was kindled only when fossil fuels registered dramatic price increases in 1973.
These increases led to evolving strategies to conserve energy resources, especially exhaustible sources, by reducing their consumption and developing renewable sources of energy. To achieve any significant savings in energy consumption in manufacturing processes, the food industry must reliably assess energy consumption at each unit operation. Estimation of gross energy requirement can be used for deciding on technology options. Two approaches for achieving significant savings in energy consumption in the food industry could be: (a) improving the efficiency of each unit operation by design improvement; (b) developing new processes or products that consume less energy than traditional processes. The latter approach may be suitable for developing countries like India, which is promoting its processed food industry on a priority basis. A few technologies that require considerably less energy to process products developed in India are highlighted in this paper.
INTRODUCTION The abilities to control and use energy sources were important milestones in man's progress and civilization. The development from a primitive hunter-gatherer society to the present has progressed through the use of various energy options: fire, animal power, water, wind, fossil fuels, and nuclear energy. Throughout history the generation of surplus has been the fundamental purpose of any economic activity.
The use of newer energy systems also followed this rule and helped to generate surpluses of time, resources, and energy. Curtailing the gross energy expended in the food production and delivery system in developing economies is critically important in any long-term strategy for energy conservation. An intense awareness has been generated in most of the developed countries regarding the acute need for energy conservation in all sectors and has resulted in both voluntary and statutory steps to cut down on energy cost and conserve scarce energy resources. In the developing world, not much activity is evident in this critical area, and even the availability of vital data regarding energy generation and use is doubtful.
If any worthwhile practical programme of energy conservation is to be planned and implemented, it is necessary to have (al a reliable database concerning production and consumption of various types of energy sources by different users and (b) energy auditing at various levels to provide a firm basis for identifying options for saving energy. APPROACHES TO ENERGY CONSERVATION Industry is generally more aware of energy conservation today than it was when the oil crunch started in 1973. The degree of response to energy problems can be expected to vary among industries and would be higher in the case of energy-intensive industries. It is reported that many major industries in the developed countries have initiated efforts to effect immediate savings by improving operating procedures requiring comparatively smaller capital investments. Energy conservation in the food industry on a national scale can be achieved with two approaches: a.
Symbiosis – in which different species have a cooperative or mutually beneficial relationship – is everywhere in nature: honeybees receive vital nutrients from flowers while delivering pollen (male) directly to the female parts of the flower; pilot fish gain protection from predators, while sharks gain freedom from parasites; and dogs protect their owners, while receiving food and shelter. Cited by as a major driver of evolution, symbiosis has played an important role in the mutual survival of certain species. Two elements in nature that are also very symbiotic are energy and water: It takes water to produce and distribute energy, while energy is used to treat, pump, and distribute water. This inextricable link is knowns as the. Yet, energy and water planners do not treat these important resources as symbiotic “species,” resulting in a lot of waste – something we cannot afford with climate change on the rise. Floating solar panels atop bodies of water, or the cleverly nicknamed “floatovoltaics,” are a possible solution for both energy and water challenges.
The panels help to reduce evaporation of water – critical in hot, dry places like Texas and California – and the water helps to keep the panels cool, increasing their efficiency. Plus, compared to more traditional fuel sources, solar PV requires little to no water to produce electricity. Incorporating more solar energy and relying less on coal or natural gas means greater water savings overall. Floatovoltaics seem like a win-win solution, but it’s not being deployed on a large scale yet. Some countries and U.S.
States have surged ahead in testing this technology. So why isn’t a state like Texas, with big reservoirs, crippling droughts, and lots of solar potential, taking this bull by the horns?
International and domestic floatovoltaic leaders Several countries are embracing the inventive energy-water solution: –Japan: The largest floating solar plant in the world is underway at the near Tokyo. According to the plant’s developer, it will generate “enough electricity to power approximately 4,970 typical households — while offsetting about 8,170 tons of CO2 emissions annually. This is equal to 19,000 barrels of oil consumed.” That’s an impressive generating capacity, especially considering Japan’s acute energy demand crisis. In 2015, Japan only produced about of its own energy and imported the rest. Since the Fukushima nuclear disaster in 2011, Japan has shifted toward the development of more local, renewable energy, but clearly still has a ways to go before becoming energy independent.
Solar is also much less of a water hog. Islands always need to protect water resources, and space for solar panels is limited, so capitalizing on “unused” space above the reservoir makes sense. Simultaneously powering and quenching an island nation’s thirst in the face of climate change is a very smart move. –England: Europe’s largest floating solar plant is being constructed in the II Reservoir near London, England. In a nice bit of symmetry, the power generated from the panels will provide electricity for the utility’s nearby water treatment facility, helping Thames Water achieve its goal of self-generating one-third of its power by 2020.
This is not the first floating solar plant in the U.K., but its size will dwarf the pilot project that was completed previously. –India: Work is underway for the country’s largest project on, the biggest freshwater lake in the northeastern state of Manipur. India is also host to a precursor of floating solar: SunEdison India previously launched the in Gujarat, using the long network of canals across the state to generate electricity from panels that are anchored into concrete blocks on the embankment. Like floatovoltaics, those panels result in less evaporation.
In a country struggling with the freshwater needs of its enormous population base, reducing the evaporation rates of the canal water is critical. And the idea is gaining steam stateside, as well: –California: Unsurprisingly, California is a leader in floatovoltaics in the U.S. The state’s clean energy subsidies and incentives, pressure from the drought, and an innovative tech sector have all helped this technology find a foothold.
The Wine Country has seen the greatest uptake: Both Napa and Sonoma have floatovoltaic systems underway. In Napa, the (pictured above) installed a system in 2008 that reduces evaporation from the waterway by 70 percent and generates enough power to completely offset the winery’s annual use. ’s installation, due to come online this year, is expected to generate power for 3,000 homes, making it the second largest floatovoltaic system after Japan’s. We store a lot of water in large reservoirs, which could easily lend themselves to floating solar panels. –New Jersey: Probably a surprise to those outside the solar industry, New Jersey is one of the leading solar states in the U.S., beating out sunny spots like Texas, New Mexico, and Nevada (that’s down to politics, not potential). Consequently, New Jersey is home to a floatovoltaic project at the, run by New Jersey American Water.
The project generates about two percent of the water treatment plant’s power, saving around $16,000 per year. Why not Texas? Why isn’t Texas further ahead in the clean energy game?
It’s a question I ask myself every day, especially when I think about the water-saving aspects of solar panels, both the floating and mounted kind. It comes down to political leadership on clean energy, which is still a struggle in an oil and gas state like Texas. At the same time, we are a state plagued by droughts, and every policymaker knows that. Texas is likely looking down the barrel of – developing our prime potential for floatovoltaics could help alleviate future stress.
Whole Foods Savings
We store a lot of water in large reservoirs, which could easily lend themselves to floating solar panels. Or, we could use the technology on cooling ponds at traditional power plants. In addition to generating solar power next to a grid-connected traditional power plant, this would reduce the evaporation of those ponds, a particularly critical issue in our hot summers. It’s worth noting the floatovoltaic projects underway in other countries and states all have some sort of policy incentive behind them. We need political leadership to encourage the transition to cleaner, water-saving energy sources. With just under a year before our legislators come back to Austin, here’s to hoping they begin to see the symbiotic relationship between energy and water.
Saving Energy Through Food Truck
The evolution and survival of our species depends on it. Photo source: Flickr/ This post originally appeared on our blog.